æœ¬ä¹¦ä½œè€…éº¦å…‹â€¢è´èŒ¨å‹‹çˆµæ˜¯è‹±å›½ä¸Šè®®é™¢è®®å‘˜ï¼Œç»ˆèº«è´µæ—ï¼Œæ›¾ä»»ä¿å®ˆå…šå‰¯ä¸»å¸ã€ä¸Šè®®é™¢å‰¯è®®é•¿åŠå‰¯ä¸»å¸ï¼ŒçŽ°ä»»è‹±å›½æ”¿åºœå›½é™…å‘å±•éƒ¨å›½åŠ¡å¤§è‡£ã€‚éº¦å…‹â€¢è´èŒ¨å‹‹çˆµäºŽ2009å¹´å¼€å§‹è¿›è¡Œæ…ˆå–„å…¬ç›Šå¾’æ¥ï¼Œ2011å¹´åœ¨å¤«äººé›ªç³çš„å¸®åŠ©ä¸‹å¼€å§‹è¿›è¡Œé•¿è·ç¦»æ…ˆå–„å…¬ç›Šå¾’æ¥ã€‚2015å¹´ï¼Œä»–ä»ŽåŒ—äº¬å¾’æ¥åˆ°æå·žï¼Œä¸ºä¸å›½çº¢åå—ä¼šå‹Ÿé›†äº†ä¹ä¸‡è‹±é•‘ã€‚æˆªè‡³2016å¹´ï¼Œä»–å¾’æ¥çš„è¶³è¿¹å·²éå¸ƒåŒ…æ‹¬é˜¿æ ¹å»·ã€å·´è¥¿ã€ä¸å›½ã€è‹±å›½ã€å¾·å›½ã€å¸Œè…Šç‰åœ¨å†…çš„23ä¸ªå›½å®¶ã€‚åœ¨ä»–å¾’æ¥è¿›è¡Œæ…ˆå–„æ´»åŠ¨çš„è¿‡ç¨‹ä¸ï¼Œå…ˆåŽæ”¶åˆ°æ½˜åŸºæ–‡ã€ç½—æ ¼ã€ç½—é©¬æ•™çš‡ã€å·´èµ«ã€å¡æ¢…ä¼¦ã€ä¼Šä¸½èŽŽç™½å¥³çŽ‹çš„æŽ¥è§æˆ–è‡´è¾žé—®å€™ï¼Œè¿˜å—åˆ°äº†ä¹ è¿‘å¹³ä¸»å¸çš„ç‚¹åèµžæ‰¬ã€‚æœ¬ä¹¦ç”±è‹±å›½ä¸ºå’Œå¹³å¾’æ¥åŸºé‡‘ä¼šä¸»å¸ã€è‹±å›½ä¸åŽæ€»å•†ä¼šå¸¸åŠ¡å‰¯ä¸»å¸å…¼ç§˜ä¹¦é•¿ã€è‹±å›½æµ™æ±Ÿè”è°Šä¼šä¸»å¸æŽé›ªç³â€¢è´èŒ¨å‹‹çˆµå¤«äººç¿»è¯‘ã€æ±‡ç¼–è€Œæˆã€‚
Why are the Chinese media Chinese?
Prof. Hugo de Burgh (University of Westminster)
Date: 27 February 2017 Time: 5:00 PM
Finishes: 27 February 2017Time: 7:00 PM
Venue: Russell Square: College Buildings Room: G3
Type of Event: Forum
Registration: Free, but registration essential to guarantee a place
Until recently media academics have tended to look at the Chinese media and in particular Chinese journalism as deviations from the norm, or as having, on account of political pressure, failed to have modernised. Underpinning this is a theory that â€˜modernisationâ€™ is a common process through which all societies go, sooner or later, and that the most advanced societies are the Anglophone.The assumption has also been made that identical technology and similar organisation work to homogenise media.Nevertheless, recently there has been a move towards trying to understand the media of specific countries as reflexions of culture and products of their own history. Simultaneously, format producers work hard to localise formats created elsewhere. If we apply this approach to China, the most useful explanatory tools are provided by anthropology and history. Political economy can only unearth part of the story. In this talk, I will attempt to show how, if we look at the Chinese media differently, we can explain better how they are distinct from those of the Anglosphere, as indeed are those of the Mediterranean, and probably other areas of the world. The Chinese media, like the Anglophone, have both strengths and weaknesses. The political systems to which they are attached influence them but they are also reflexions of cultures which have also conditioned the political systems.There are, in other words, no such things as global media. The Anglophone media are Anglophone. Chinese, Chinese.
HugoÂ deÂ Burgh is the director of the China Media Centre andÂ Professor of Journalism in the Communications and Media Research Institute ofÂ the University of Westminster.Â A pioneer of the study of the Chinese media in Europe, he worked for 15 years in British TV and is an authority on investigative journalism. His books and articles on China and its media have been published widely.Â He is writer presenter of The West You Don’t Know, a 7-part documentary series which is the first commission by CCTV of foreign-made programmes and was transmitted over Chinese New Year 2013. He isÂ the author or editor of 8 books; writer on investigative journalism now specialising in Chinese affairs, hisÂ Chinaâ€™s MediaÂ will be published by Polity USA in 2017. Earlier books include The West You Really Donâ€™t Know (in Chinese, 2013),Â Chinaâ€™s Environment and Chinaâ€™s Environment Journalists (2012)Â andÂ Investigative JournalismÂ (2ndEdition, 2008).Â He is Professor atÂ Tsinghua University, and SAFEA (National Administration for International Expertise) Endowment Professor for 2014-6.
Organiser: SOAS China Institute
Contact email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Contact Tel: +44 (0)20 7898 4823